Georgia Republicans have chosen Brian Kemp to face Democrat Stacey Abrams for governor. Their November matchup will test history and highlight the widening gulf between the two major parties in style and substance in the era of President Donald Trump.
Kemp, a two-term secretary of state, trounced longtime Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle in a runoff Tuesday after campaigning as a “politically incorrect conservative” and welcoming Trump’s endorsement. The intraparty tussle was marked by hard-line rhetoric on guns, immigration and government spending.
Abrams, who has become a national Democratic celebrity in her bid to become the United States’ first black female governor, dominated her primary in May after pledging to expand Medicaid insurance and spend more on education, infrastructure and job training.
The results have animated bases on the left and the right, leaving voters who consider themselves somewhere in the middle to decide one of the country’s most closely watched midterm contests.
Both national parties opened their coffers ahead of Tuesday’s GOP runoff; and the outcome will reverberate into 2020 as Democrats try to prove that GOP-controlled Georgia, after decades of population growth that’s made the electorate more urban and less white, has evolved into a presidential battleground.
To test that theory, Georgians set up a compelling juxtaposition between candidates that both sides eagerly cast as extremist:
Will a Deep South state — led by white, male governors since 1776 and not long removed from having Confederate insignia on its flag — elect as governor a self-declared progressive black woman from Atlanta as its chief executive?
Or will an increasingly urban, diversifying state — now the eighth most populous and home to The Coca-Cola Co., Delta, Home Depot, UPS and the 1996 Summer Olympics — embrace a brash, gun-wielding, chain saw-cranking Republican who says he’ll “round up criminal illegals” in his own pickup truck?
Kemp, 54, immediately set the race against the national backdrop, thanking Trump for his endorsement while linking Abrams to a “radical left” he says threatens Georgia’s “red-state” values.
“Do you want a governor who is going to answer to Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton?” Kemp boomed in his victory speech, referring to the House Democratic leader from California and the 2016 presidential nominee who lost Georgia by 4.5 percentage points.
That echoed a Republican Governors Association ad unveiled before GOP runoff votes were tallied. The 30-second spot joins Abrams’ picture alongside Clinton and Pelosi, with a voiceover warning that Abrams is “the most radical liberal to ever run for governor.”
Abrams, 44, was more circumspect with a Twitter fundraising appeal that mentioned Kemp only by his last name. “Service, faith & family guide our vision for GA: Affordable health care. Excellent public schools for every child. An economy that works for all,” she wrote.
Other Democrats more eagerly fingered Kemp as the dangerous option.
“The craziest Republican emerged,” said Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, chairman of the Democratic Governors Association, in an interview. DGA recently steered $250,000 to the Georgia Democratic Party for its fall efforts.
Inlsee said Kemp’s message, including his attacks on national Democrats, make him little more than “a sycophant for Donald Trump,” while Abrams answers with a “real economic agenda for working families.”
If Kemp “wants to run against Nancy Pelosi,” Inslee added, “he should move to San Francisco.”
Criticisms To Face
Beyond the pitched rhetoric, both candidates have weaknesses to exploit. Kemp is roundly criticized because the personal data of millions of registered Georgia voters was twice compromised during his tenure as secretary of state. Kemp blamed an employee and the contractor running the state’s elections system. Republicans hit Abrams for reporting $170,000 in credit card and student loan debt along with owing $50,000 to the IRS — liabilities she attributes to her Yale law education and her financial support for several relatives.
Republicans, like party strategist and pollster Mark Rountree, argue that Abrams’ policy agenda means higher taxes — anathema to the suburban voters she’ll need. Rountree said her support for removing Confederate monuments from state ground will ensure conservative turnout.
Still, some Republicans lamented that a long primary battle will leave their nominee broke.
“Casey’s spent all of his bullets on Brian and vice-versa, while Stacey Abrams is just collecting money,” said Jack Kingston, a former congressman who endorsed Cagle.
At least the matchup deviates from Georgia’s recent penchant for establishment, predictable governors, regardless of party. Outgoing Republican Gov. Nathan Deal — who once served North Georgia as a Democratic congressman — backed Cagle over Kemp, a tacit acknowledgment that Kemp is to the right of the typical GOP governor here.
Four years ago, Democrats nominated Jason Carter, a grandson of former President and Georgia Gov. Jimmy Carter, but the younger Carter lost to Deal by 8 percentage points. This year, many of Carter’s old-guard backers initially sided with Abrams’ primary opponent, also a former state lawmaker. Stacey Evans hammered Abrams for making too many deals with Republicans — including Deal — but party elders still viewed Evans, who is white, as the more moderate choice.
Abrams’ 3-to-1 victory obliterated that supposedly safe course.
“The most important thing about any candidate is matching the moment, and Stacey Abrams has clearly done” this, Jason Carter told the AP.
The question, Carter said, is whether she can “connect with enough voters” beyond the Democratic base, capitalizing on the historic nature of her candidacy “without being consumed by it.”