Reliability Of Pricey New Voting Machines In U.S. Questioned

This May 9, 2018, photo shows the touchscreen of a voting machine during early voting in Sandy Springs. In the rush to find reliable new voting machines, many state and local officials in the U.S. are turning to pricey models that some computer security experts see as risky. Georgia, Delaware, South Carolina and key counties in crucial swing states have bought the ballot-marking machines.

John Bazemore / Associated PRess file

Nearly 1 in 5 U.S. voters will cast ballots this year on devices that look and feel like the discredited paperless voting machines they once used, yet leave a paper record of the vote. But computer security experts are warning that these so-called ballot-marking devices still pose too much of a risk.

Ballot-marking machines were initially developed not as primary vote-casting tools but as “accessible” alternatives for the disabled. They print out paper records that are scanned by optical readers that tabulate the vote.

They cost at least twice as much as hand-marked paper ballots, which computer scientists prefer because paper can’t be hacked. That’s an important consideration as U.S. intelligence officials warn that malicious meddling in this year’s presidential contest could be worse than in 2016.