George H.W. Bush’s Wartime Experience Shaped His Approach To Politics

George Herbert Walker Bush was the 41st president of the United States, but in many ways, he was the last of his kind.

Bush, who died Friday at 94, was the last World War II veteran to serve in the Oval Office, and he presided over the end of the long Cold War with the Soviets. He was also the last person raised within the confines of the once politically dominant “Eastern Establishment” to attain the presidency.

“A real transition, one might say, came with the conclusion of Bush’s term,” says presidential historian Robert Dallek.

Bush’s background and history made him temperamentally different from his successors. But to the extent that he was a transitional figure, his story is not all about old values being left behind.

Bush was an aggressive campaigner, willing to attack his opponents in highly personal terms. His presidential races helped set the template for the kind of politics that followed.

His one successful presidential run, in 1988, represented the first time, according to Time magazine, that “attacks on an opponent, rather than promotion of one’s own agenda, [became] the primary target of a presidential campaign.”

Impelled by duty

His successors have had their share of degrees from Harvard and Yale, but Bush was thoroughly a product of the WASPy aristocracy of the Northeast — a graduate of Andover and Yale, the son of a Connecticut U.S. senator, the scion of two Wall Street banking dynasties.

Bush was inspired by a speech at Phillips Academy Andover given by Henry L. Stimson, a two-time secretary of war and “kind of a god in those Northeastern circles,” says Geoffrey Kabaservice, author of Rule and Ruin, a book about moderate Republicanism.

“Hearing Stimson talk about patriotism and American values was one of the things that impelled Bush to enlist,” says Lewis Gould, a historian of the Republican Party. “He was impelled by a sense of duty and put himself in harm’s way, and his life goes in that direction.”

Bush enlisted in the Navy on his 18th birthday, soon becoming one of its youngest pilots. He flew nearly five dozen missions. He was shot down on Sept. 2, 1944, over the island of Chichi Jima in the Pacific and floated on a raft for a couple of hours before being picked up by a submarine.

Bush always “became very, very emotional whenever he talked about the military,” says Chriss Winston, his chief White House speechwriter.

After a 1989 explosion on the USS Iowa killed 47 crewmen, Bush delivered a speech in which the emotional high point was intended to be a line in which he talked about his own experience taking off in the morning and coming back to an empty deck.

But he couldn’t deliver the line and skipped right over it in his prepared text, Winston recalls.

“In speechwriting, we learned we had to tone down the actual remarks and not make them as emotional because he simply couldn’t get through it,” she says.

Last of the line

Bush was the last of an unbroken 40-year line of presidents who had served in uniform during World War II, starting with Dwight D. Eisenhower, the former supreme Allied commander.

“That’s why members of Congress got along better in the old days,” Kabaservice says. “A lot of them had fought in World War II and they looked at each other not as partisan enemies, but people who had been comrades in arms.”

The World War II generation had a sense of serving the country together and also shared a belief in professionalism, says Jeremi Suri, a University of Texas historian.

“Bush was the last president who believed that people who had knowledge and experience should make decisions based on that and not on their ideological views,” Suri says. “It was a businessman’s approach to making decisions about leadership. You appoint and promote the person who’s most qualified over the person you might agree with more.”

His generation might have had suspicions about political rivals but accepted them as part of the landscape, Gould says. There was no shame in making deals with politicians from the other side of the aisle.

That partly explains why the Republican was willing to violate his “no new taxes” pledge with the budget agreement of 1990, which hurt him politically yet set the stage for a decade of increasingly sound federal budgets.

“Bush was viscerally connected to the notion that there were men of goodwill on both sides of the aisle,” Gould says. ” ‘This is in the interest of the country, so despite my tax pledge, which I won the presidency in making, circumstances have changed and I’ll take the political risk.’ ”

The importance of relationships

Throughout his political career, from his Texas campaigns for House and Senate in the 1960s through his presidential runs in the 1980s and 1990s, Bush was willing at times to be expedient and adopt more conservative stances on fiscal and social issues than he appeared to hold while governing.

His 1988 race against Democrat Michael Dukakis became notorious for an ugly ad showcasing rapist and murderer Willie Horton. After questioning the patriotism of Democrat Bill Clinton in 1992, Bush said, “You can call it mud wrestling, but I think it’s fair to put it into focus.”

He was willing to say what he thought was necessary as a candidate, but in office, Bush maintained a strict sense of patrician decorum.

“He saw himself as a deal-maker, not as someone who had all the right answers,” Suri says. “There was a humility about him that’s been lost on both sides of the aisle.”

The importance of building up relationships was an ethos Bush brought not only to domestic politics, but also to international affairs, which became his major focus as president. He had come to know many foreign leaders through his service as vice president, CIA director, ambassador to the United Nations and envoy to China.

What Bush biographer Tom Wicker called his “matchless personal acquaintance” with world leaders helped him form a large coalition to repel Iraq after its 1990 invasion of Kuwait and also shaped his response to a series of revolutions in Europe that led to the end of the Cold War.

Bush quietly gave space to Mikhail Gorbachev, president of the Soviet Union, to allow that country to adjust to the decline in its fortunes and influence. Bush did not threaten, make grandiose pronouncements or gloat, Robert Gates wrote in his memoir From the Shadows. Gates was Bush’s CIA director and later became secretary of defense under Bush’s son and President Barack Obama.

“As the communist bloc was disintegrating, it was George Bush’s skilled, yet quiet, statecraft that made a revolutionary time seem so much less dangerous than it actually was,” Gates wrote.

Copyright 2018 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.