Jury selection will start in October for Trump Organization criminal trial

Weisselberg and the Trump Organization were indicted in July 2021 on charges they conspired through a variety of gimmicks and deceptions to evade federal, state and local taxes, an alleged scheme that stretched over 16 years and allegedly saved Weisselberg close to $1 million.

Since then, all of the action in the case has taken place in correspondence and behind closed doors. Throughout late 2021, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office continued to gather evidence, interviewing witnesses and presenting evidence to a grand jury.

On Jan. 1, 2022, a new Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, was sworn in, replacing Cyrus Vance Jr., who brought the indictment.

Donald Trump went to the Supreme Court of the United States twice in an effort to block Vance’s team from gathering documents. He failed both times.

In February, two senior investigators quit the District Attorney’s office because they believed Bragg was unlikely to charge Donald Trump individually with crimes.

One of the attorneys, Mark Pomerantz, told Bragg in a letter his team had gathered voluminous evidence of financial crimes committed by Trump, connected with false and misleading statements about his finances.

“I fear that your decision means that Mr. Trump will not be held fully accountable for his crimes,” Pomerantz wrote. “I have worked too hard as a lawyer, and for too long, now to become a passive participant in what I believe to be a grave failure of justice.”

In a statement in April, Bragg insisted the investigation of Trump is ongoing, and pledged to inform the public when the probe ends.

Bragg has not brought charges against Trump, and allowed a grand jury hearing evidence in the probe to lapse at the end of April.

Reached by phone in February, former Trump lawyer Ron Fischetti told NPR he believed his client is in the clear.

“I’m very happy – and you can quote me on that,” he said.

Whether or not there are additional indictments, the Trump Organization and Weisselberg now are set to be tried by a local Manhattan jury.

Prosecutors will likely present evidence they say shows that Donald Trump personally wrote checks for private school tuition for two of Weisselberg’s family members, amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars. The income was never declared, the indictment says.

Prosecutors also say that the Trump Organization deducted the value of un-taxed benefits such as rent and utilities from Weisselberg’s compensation, and recorded it in a ledger. Both Weisselberg and the Trump Organization have pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.

Lawyers for Weisselberg and the Trump Organization have attacked the case against them as politically motivated. Weisselberg’s lawyers said their client is “collateral damage in the Manhattan District Attorney’s and New York Attorney General’s years-long pursuit of Mr. Weisselberg’s long-time boss, Donald J. Trump.”

They also argued that the case is deeply flawed because it relies on information gathered from an untrustworthy source: former Trump executive Michael Cohen, who was convicted of tax evasion and campaign finance crimes in 2018.

On Friday, Judge Merchan denied almost all defense motions, but did remove one count against the Trump Organization of criminal tax fraud in the third degree.

More than a year after local prosecutors filed criminal charges against former President Trump’s family business…….WHAT HAPPENED.

It is the first public courtroom proceeding in this case in almost a year.

Since then, all of the action in the case has taken place in correspondence and behind closed doors.

In January, the Trump and Weisselberg <> legal teams both filed motions to dismiss the case. Also that month, a new Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, was sworn in, <>replacing Cyrus Vance Jr., who brought the indictment <>. Bragg’s arrival shook up the ongoing investigation into Trump Organization business practices.

In February, two senior investigators quit the District Attorney’s Office because they believed Bragg was unlikely to charge Donald Trump himself with crimes.

One of the attorneys, Mark Pomerantz, told Bragg in a letter his team had gathered voluminous evidence of financial crimes committed by Trump, connected with false and misleading statements about his finances.

“I fear that your decision means that Mr. Trump will not be held fully accountable for his crimes,” Pomerantz wrote. “I have worked too hard as a lawyer, and for too long, now to become a passive participant in what I believe to be a grave failure of justice.”

Reached by phone,<> former President Trump’s lawyer Ron Fischetti told NPR he believed his client is in the clear.

“I’m very happy – and you can quote me on that,” he said.

In a statement in April, Bragg insisted the investigation of Trump is ongoing, and pledged to inform the public when the probe ends. Bragg has not brought charges against Trump, and allowed a grand jury hearing evidence in the probe to lapse. <>

Weisselberg and the Trump Organization were charged in July 2021 with conspiring through a variety of gimmicks and deceptions to evade federal, state and local taxes, an alleged scheme that stretched over 16 years and saved Weisselberg close to $1 million.

Among other //things// accusations, the indictment alleges that //Donald// Trump personally wrote checks for private school tuition for two of Weisselberg’s family members, amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars. The income was never declared, the indictment says. Prosecutors also say that the Trump Organization deducted the value of un-taxed benefits like rent and utilities from Weisselberg’s compensation, and recorded it in a ledger.

Both Weisselberg and the Trump Organization have pleaded not guilty.

Lawyers for Weisselberg and the Trump Organization have attacked the case against them as politically motivated.

Weisselberg’s lawyers said their client is “collateral damage in the Manhattan District Attomey’s and New York Attorney General’s years-long pursuit of Mr. Weisselberg’s long-time boss, Donald J. Trump.”

They also argue that the case is deeply flawed because it relies on information gathered from an untrustworthy source: former Trump executive Michael Cohen, who was convicted of tax evasion and campaign finance crimes in 2018.